<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guidance on OL4 adoption</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weblog.openlaszlo.org/archives/2007/04/guidance-on-ol4-adoption/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weblog.openlaszlo.org/archives/2007/04/guidance-on-ol4-adoption/</link>
	<description>asynchronous javascript since before it was cool</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: OpenLaszlo Community Germany &#183; OpenLaszlo Version 4.0.2 Release</title>
		<link>http://weblog.openlaszlo.org/archives/2007/04/guidance-on-ol4-adoption/#comment-27061</link>
		<dc:creator>OpenLaszlo Community Germany &#183; OpenLaszlo Version 4.0.2 Release</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 00:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.openlaszlo.org/?p=130#comment-27061</guid>
		<description>[...] Nach dem offiziellen Release der 4.0.2 Version von OpenLaszlo steht der erste Minor Release der neuen OpenLaszlo Version. Eine Vielzahl an Bugs wurde behoben und einige neue Features implementiert (z.B. der HTML Tag innerhalb von LZX). Auch wenn die 4.0.2er Version schon erhebliche Verbesserungen enthält, ist sie noch nicht für den Produktionsbetrieb freigegeben (hier mehr zu den Gründen). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nach dem offiziellen Release der 4.0.2 Version von OpenLaszlo steht der erste Minor Release der neuen OpenLaszlo Version. Eine Vielzahl an Bugs wurde behoben und einige neue Features implementiert (z.B. der HTML Tag innerhalb von LZX). Auch wenn die 4.0.2er Version schon erhebliche Verbesserungen enthält, ist sie noch nicht für den Produktionsbetrieb freigegeben (hier mehr zu den Gründen). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jgrandy</title>
		<link>http://weblog.openlaszlo.org/archives/2007/04/guidance-on-ol4-adoption/#comment-23476</link>
		<dc:creator>jgrandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 01:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.openlaszlo.org/?p=130#comment-23476</guid>
		<description>Sure, we are doing a planning round now (shipping OL4 was pretty all-consuming), and will have details for you by the end of April.

I'll point out that IE is a very difficult browser to fully support given the scope of OL4's capabilities. We are aware that our IE support falls short of that for other browsers, and are working hard (subject to the peculiarities of that browser) to address them.

jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, we are doing a planning round now (shipping OL4 was pretty all-consuming), and will have details for you by the end of April.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll point out that IE is a very difficult browser to fully support given the scope of OL4&#8217;s capabilities. We are aware that our IE support falls short of that for other browsers, and are working hard (subject to the peculiarities of that browser) to address them.</p>
<p>jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://weblog.openlaszlo.org/archives/2007/04/guidance-on-ol4-adoption/#comment-23405</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 13:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.openlaszlo.org/?p=130#comment-23405</guid>
		<description>This was very informative, but I'd like to have "long-term" and "short-term" projects defined.  

We've used 3.x of OL successfully and were very pleased but after using OL4 for one day specifically for DHTML, I can't view 4.0 as anything but beta unfortunately and I wouldn't label it a x.0.0 release.  In my limited testing, things seemed to work fine in FF but IE7 seemed to have some basic issues.  Like below (doesn't work because of valign):

	
		
		
	

I am looking forward to the next release however because I think OL4 has the best potential compared to other products out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was very informative, but I&#8217;d like to have &#8220;long-term&#8221; and &#8220;short-term&#8221; projects defined.  </p>
<p>We&#8217;ve used 3.x of OL successfully and were very pleased but after using OL4 for one day specifically for DHTML, I can&#8217;t view 4.0 as anything but beta unfortunately and I wouldn&#8217;t label it a x.0.0 release.  In my limited testing, things seemed to work fine in FF but IE7 seemed to have some basic issues.  Like below (doesn&#8217;t work because of valign):</p>
<p>I am looking forward to the next release however because I think OL4 has the best potential compared to other products out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
