<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CSS in OpenLaszlo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weblog.openlaszlo.org/archives/2008/11/css-in-openlaszlo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weblog.openlaszlo.org/archives/2008/11/css-in-openlaszlo/</link>
	<description>asynchronous javascript since before it was cool</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gavin Grossett</title>
		<link>http://weblog.openlaszlo.org/archives/2008/11/css-in-openlaszlo/#comment-87743</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Grossett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 13:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.openlaszlo.org/?p=238#comment-87743</guid>
		<description>*I* find CSS hard and I work in this damned field. Why do my sites look so basic? Because I can't do any better. So, I mean, feel to be elitist and state the untruth that CSS is universally easier. For people who want to produce valid-code layouts who realize that life is too short and they'll never get that time back, let them use the jeezly tables. Get them to focus on valid code. Stop beating up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*I* find CSS hard and I work in this damned field. Why do my sites look so basic? Because I can&#8217;t do any better. So, I mean, feel to be elitist and state the untruth that CSS is universally easier. For people who want to produce valid-code layouts who realize that life is too short and they&#8217;ll never get that time back, let them use the jeezly tables. Get them to focus on valid code. Stop beating up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

